A victim can develop mental attachment to the tormentor. Patty Hearst, a
millionaire's daughter, was kidnapped and fell in love with her kidnappers.
In the Night Porter, the dark movie by Liliana Cavani, an ex-inmate of a
Nazi camp and an ex-SS-man, her tormentor of past, run a passionate love
affair.
Now something similar happens in the Palestinian American community. The
most reviled and wronged group of American population is called to defend
the most prosperous and powerful one against their own supporters. On 24th
of August '02, there will be an event in Washington, Rock for Palestine, or
Rock against Israel, as it is also called. The event is organised by some
right-wing Americans, loosely connected to a small group called National
Alliance (NA). Whatever one thinks about NA, one would expect a satisfied
shrug, at least, if not outright support coming from Palestinians and their
friends in the US.
Instead, in the emails there is a hysterical letter [1] addressed to "all my
Arab sisters and brothers", calling to violently confront the event in a
military manner (!) "in several different contingents with various risk
levels". The letter is extremely violent and is written in intemperate
language of hate, the like of it we have not seen before: "We have to stop
this racist scum from polluting the Palestinian cause", no less. The organisers of the event are described as "neo-Nazis", "fascists", "Nazi
enemies" and "anti-Semites". It is composed by a mysterious East Coast
Anti-Fascist Network, and has some Arab names attached to it, though for
sure it isn't written by an Arab.
Now, nobody likes Nazis, but I wonder why this militant Anti-Fascist Network
did not go out to confront gatherings and demonstrations of Judeo-Nazis?
What is so wonderful about us Jews that so many people wish to go out and
fight for us "in different contingents with various risk levels"? Why this
fighting Uruk-hai does not describe Mort Zuckerman or Richard Perle, "racist
scum"? Not even Israeli settlers, as racist as anybody, were ever described
as "racist scum" that "should not pollute Palestine".
It is a mistake to describe anybody as "scum". We should promote more
tolerant discourse, accepting or arguing, not fighting somebody else's war.
The letter of this "anti-fascist Network" looks like an attempt of the
Jewish lobby to make its adversaries to fight each other.
This thing has no end. Today they want us to fight NA, tomorrow they would
ask us to condemn Farrakhan, and next day - to reject Hezbollah and Hamas.
Maybe some of us would like to be approved and promoted only by the Yale
professors. But we live in real world. Israel accepts support of every
racist that extends its support: be it South African apartheid of old, or
present-say fundamentalists, and it does not hurt its "credibility".
It does not mean that one should run forward and endorse the NA
get-together. But these people should be worked with, not rejected out of
hand. Some of their erroneous ideas could be corrected. If they would just
say "affirmation of European legacy" instead of "white supremacy" you would
discover that the arguments against them collapse. It is like saying "let us
make love" instead of 'fuck you' - the meaning is quite similar, but wording
is important.
I do not intend even to enter discussion, whether the organisers of the
event are good guys or bad guys. They can't be more racist than the present
Israeli government and the American Jewish community leadership. They can't
be more racist than Pat Roberson and his bunch of (anti-)Christian Zionists.
Let this anti-fascist (and surely crypto-Jewish) network go out and fight
them first. I would bless whoever supports the cause of Palestine without
checking their ideological credentials. I bless all supporters of Palestine
full stop.
However, navigating to the home page of the NA, one finds a cartoon [2] to sympathise with. It is rather crude depiction of a Neo-Con, looking like a
cross between Kissinger and Perle, asking America to kill his enemies: Iraq,
Iran, Saudi Arabia and so forth. Yes, these guys are short of finesse, some
of their ideas are weird, but they came to correct conclusion: America
should not fight the WWIII for the Zionists' sake.
In our Togethernet, "the freest discussion group in the known Universe" J,
we had some people who will attend the concert. One of them wrote: "I don't
know of ANY white "supremacists" outside of a couple of fantasizing juvenile
delinquents in the World Church of the Creator and some Hollywood Nazis. And
a section of the Republican Party personified by George Bush. "Supremacist"
is a label created by the Zionists of the ADL and kindred spirits. It was
used for the same purpose as calling all Palestinian opposition to Zionist
occupation and invasion, 'terrorism'. Methinks the Zionists engage in a
lot of projectionism when they cast their epithets".
If we go out now to defend the powerful American Jews and to fight these
'White' guys, because we do not like their ideology, our next step should be
to go out and defend Israel with our own bodies against possible attack from
Saddam Hussein's Iraq. Saddam is also supposed to be a bad guy, and I am
ready to accept he is. In 1991, I wrote in the leading Russian newspaper,
"Probably Saddam is a bad guy, but the Middle East needs a strong bad guy to
counteract other, Zionist bad guys".
The world is full of bad guys, and things are good only if and when the bad
guys balance each other. Saddam would balance Sharon, while the White
supremacists would balance the Jewish supremacists. If indeed these men are
not supremacists, but cultural separatists, as they claim, we certainly can
do things together with them, and with another group of cultural
separatists, the Black Muslims, too.
The author of the epistle offers, with his low grade cunning, an additional
reason for Palestinians to go and fight for Jews: "If we don't do this, our
Nazi enemies will claim our noble cause and our Zionist enemies will try to
present them as our face". Let him rest assured. In Israel, and in Jewish
communities overseas, Palestinians are presented as Nazis on daily basis.
Menachem Begin called Arafat, "Hitler" years ago. If there is a nasty thing
that the Jewish-owned media could say and print about Palestinians, they
already did it. When Palestinian children are shot, Palestinians are blamed
that they let their children out. The Palestinians are already smeared so
much that they can not be smeared more: they are already described as
Jew-haters and baby-killers. How come we Jews do not become "discredited"
because of Kahane terrorists or Sharon's assassins? Because people
understand: not every Jew is a Judeo-Nazi. In the same way, Americans can
distinguish between different opponents of the Israeli apartheid.
Let us suppose for the sake of argument, that these 'white supremacists' are
real Nazis. (They are not). It would be enough for them to cease attacking
Jews, and they would become perfectly good in the eyes of the US media.
After that, they would be permitted to say whatever they wish against
Muslims, Palestinians, Blacks. All this talk against fascism lasts only as
long as the fascists are against Jews. The moment they switch sides, they
get kosher approval. Now, an Israeli government delegation participated in
deliberations of European extreme right ("fascists") in Brussels [3]. In
the US, the "pro-white" people are not courted by the Jewish community, but
it still could happen, if we do not watch out.
Probably you had seen this last Bruce Willis movie, Last Man Standing. In a
small Texan town there are two gangs, and Willis helps them to fight it out.
The Jewish supremacists are a million times stronger than all White
supremacists put together. Elementary strategy calls us to avoid giving any
support to the Jewish cause, until the apartheid in Palestine is dismantled.
As for the concert, probably some Palestinians and their friends will get
there, and the rest would stay away. The organisers did not ask for anybody'
s endorsement. Let the anti-fascists keep their strength for more worthy
cause. And whoever will go to fight for the American Jewish community, let
him be prepared for disappointment. His chivalry will not be reciprocated.